Negotiating a UK Settlement Agreement in Redundancy (2026): What to Push For, What to Watch For, and How the Tax Works

A settlement agreement in UK redundancy is a binding contract that ends the employment, settles any statutory or contractual claims the employee might have against the employer, and pays the employee compensation in return. The first £30,000 of compensation is tax-free. Payment in lieu of notice is fully taxable. The employee must receive independent legal advice before signing or the agreement cannot validly waive statutory rights.

Settlement agreements were called compromise agreements before 2013. They sit in section 203 of the Employment Rights Act 1996, which sets out the conditions that make them legally binding.

In a redundancy context, the settlement agreement is usually offered alongside the statutory redundancy process as a clean-break alternative to working the consultation period and then leaving with only statutory redundancy pay. The employer gets certainty and finality. The employee usually gets more money than statutory redundancy alone, in return for waiving the right to bring a tribunal claim.

The opening offer is almost never the employer's best position. Negotiation is expected. This article covers what to push for, the tax traps that catch people out, and when the deal is good enough to sign.

What makes a settlement agreement legally binding

Section 203 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 sets five conditions. All five must be met for the agreement to validly settle statutory claims.

1. In writing. The agreement must be a written document signed by both parties.

2. Relating to a particular claim or proceeding. The agreement must identify the specific statutory claims being settled. Generic wording that purports to settle "all claims arising out of the employment" without identifying them does not satisfy this requirement.

3. Independent legal advice. The employee must receive advice from a relevant independent adviser on the terms and effect of the agreement, particularly its effect on the employee's ability to pursue any claim before an employment tribunal.

4. Relevant independent adviser. The adviser must be a qualified solicitor, a certified union official, or a qualified advice centre worker. The adviser must have professional indemnity insurance covering the advice given. The adviser cannot be employed or acting for the employer.

5. The agreement must state the section 203 conditions are satisfied. Standard drafting includes a clause to this effect.

If any of these fail, the agreement cannot validly settle statutory claims. The employee can still bring a tribunal claim despite signing.

The £30,000 tax-free threshold and the PILON trap

The headline rule is well-known: the first £30,000 of a termination payment is tax-free. The trap is everything that does not fall within it.

What falls within the £30,000 cap (tax-free, subject to the limit):

• Statutory redundancy pay
• Ex gratia compensation for loss of employment
• Compensation for unfair dismissal where settled before tribunal
• Compensation for discrimination linked to the termination
• Statutory notice pay where the employee is genuinely paid not to work the notice period AND the contract does not provide for it (rare)

What falls outside the £30,000 cap (fully taxable as earnings):

• Payment in lieu of notice (PILON), regardless of contract drafting, under the Post-Employment Notice Pay (PENP) rules introduced in April 2018
• Outstanding salary up to the termination date
• Accrued holiday pay
• Bonus or commission earned before termination
• Payments for past services (training reimbursements, deferred bonuses)
• Restrictive covenant payments
• Pension contributions paid as cash

The PENP rules are the most common pitfall. HMRC looks past the settlement agreement labels to the underlying nature of each payment. A payment labelled "ex gratia compensation" that is actually replacement for unworked notice will be taxed as PILON.

For a tax-efficient settlement, the agreement allocates payments correctly. Compensation for loss of employment (within the £30,000 cap) is separated from PILON, accrued holiday, and outstanding salary. The split should reflect what each payment actually represents.

Five things to push for in the negotiation

The first offer rarely captures everything an employee can extract. These are the items most worth pressing.

Higher ex gratia compensation. Statutory redundancy alone is often modest. The ex gratia top-up is where the negotiation happens. Push higher where the employer faces legal risk (unfair dismissal claim, procedural defects, discrimination angle, whistleblowing protection, breach of the redundancy process, failure to consult properly).

An agreed reference in writing. Employers are not required to provide a reference. If they agree to one, the wording goes into the settlement agreement or an annexed schedule. Negotiate for a positive reference rather than a neutral one. Include duties, length of service, key achievements, and reason for leaving (mutual termination, restructuring, or similar).

Outplacement support. Career coaching, CV review, interview preparation, and access to outplacement services have a real value. Employers often have existing supplier arrangements.

Bonus and commission treatment. Pro-rated bonus or commission for the current period should be paid. Outstanding deferred bonuses should be confirmed. Restricted stock vesting can sometimes be accelerated as part of the settlement.

Restrictive covenant release. Where the existing employment contract has post-termination restrictions (non-compete, non-solicit, non-deal), the settlement can release or narrow them. A 12-month non-compete is often reducible to 6 months or narrower geographic scope. This matters enormously if the employee is moving to a competitor.

Five things to read twice before signing

The waiver clause scope. Section 203 requires identification of specific claims being settled. Read the list. If the agreement waives discrimination claims and you may have one, get specific advice. Some claims (unknown personal injury, pension rights, post-agreement statutory rights) cannot be validly waived.

Confidentiality and non-derogatory clauses. These often go further than employees realise. A non-derogatory clause that lasts forever and prevents any mention of the employer is overreach. Negotiate for time limits and carve-outs (regulatory disclosure, professional references, family members).

Post-termination restrictive covenants. If the agreement adds or extends restrictive covenants beyond what the original employment contract provided, the consideration paid should reflect that. New covenants without specific consideration may be unenforceable but cause expensive arguments.

Tax indemnities and reps. The agreement may include a clause requiring the employee to indemnify the employer for any tax HMRC later assesses. This shifts tax risk onto the employee. Where the split of tax-free versus taxable is clean and correct, this clause is fine. Where the split is aggressive or unclear, the indemnity is dangerous.

Whistleblowing carve-out. A valid settlement agreement cannot waive future whistleblowing protection or prevent the employee making a protected disclosure (to a regulator, professional body, or the courts). The agreement should include an express carve-out confirming this. Where it does not, that is a drafting failure.

When you have a stronger negotiating position

Negotiating power is not equal in every case. The factors that move employer flexibility upward:

• The redundancy process has procedural defects (no proper consultation, inadequate selection criteria, no consideration of alternative roles)
• The employee has a strong potential discrimination claim (gender, ethnicity, age, disability, sexual orientation, religion, gender reassignment, pregnancy, marital status)
• The employee has made or is about to make a protected disclosure (whistleblowing)
• The employee has long service (more than ten years materially affects the calculus)
• The employee is senior, has unique knowledge, or holds restrictive covenants the employer wants confirmed
• The employer faces reputational risk if the matter became public
• Multiple employees are being made redundant and a tribunal pattern would be damaging
• The economic context: bigger settlement budgets exist where the company is profitable

The factors that reduce negotiating power:

• The process was followed properly and the selection was demonstrably fair
• The employee has short service
• The role is genuinely redundant and no comparable role is available
• The employer has tight cash flow and is making widespread redundancies

When to instruct a solicitor

Independent legal advice is a legal requirement, so a solicitor must review and certify the agreement. The question is how much beyond the standard review to push for.

Instruct a solicitor (rather than relying on a basic certification service) when:

• The opening offer is more than three months of salary
• Restrictive covenants are involved (existing or proposed)
• The employee may have a discrimination or whistleblowing claim
• The employee is senior or holds specialist knowledge
• The total package exceeds £30,000 and tax allocation matters
• Outstanding bonus, commission, or share-based compensation is in scope
• The relationship with the employer has been difficult and the offer may understate legal risk

Most employers contribute between £500 and £1,500 plus VAT toward legal fees. Negotiate higher where complexity demands it. Some employers will pay more in exchange for clean execution.

---

Current as at 8 June 2026. This is educational. For your specific facts, instruct a qualified employment solicitor.

Part of the Janus Compliance Employment Law cluster. See also: Legal hub, Immigration, Family law.